The media literacy activity described in the chapter are examples of literacy practices support the Common Core shifts: complex texts, grounded in evidence from texts, and building knowledge. It accomplishes the complex texts shifts by having the students grow their vocabularies through conversation, some direct instruction, and a little reading for background knowledge. Grounded in evidence from texts is seen in the activity when they are looking at the magazine covers they have to make observations and base them on readings of what was happening in that time period. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction is the keystone in this activity. This is a history class which is nonfiction, looking at views of Martin Luther King Jr. and comparing them to the views of Obama today are rich in correlating history to current events.
What do you like about the Common Core?
I like that the Common Core focuses on teaching across the curriculum and having students connect what they learn in the classroom to everyday experiences. By far the best part is getting students more into the critical thinking aspect of learning and pushing students to go further.
What concerns do you have?
The only concerns I have are not with the Common Core itself, but with the receptiveness of teachers who are given these standards. Teaching across the curriculum I think will be a real struggle for some educators because they don't want to have to learn all this new material about something that "isn't their subject."
Find another media text that supports your stance.
Use the critical questions to deconstruct this media text.
Authors and Audience:
Who produced this document, and for what purpose?
The document was produced by NEA (National Education Association) to state six ways the Common Core is good for students.
When was this produced, and what was it's historical context?
This was produced in May of 2013 when Common Core debates were heating up.
Who is the target audience?
The audience are parents and skeptics of the Common Core.
Messages and Meanings:
What are the messages communicated?
The messages are that the Common Core is good for students.
What techniques are used to attract and hold attention?
They give out six pros for the Common Core and avoid any cons for the plan.
How might people interpret this message differently?
Some people will interpret the message as the Common Core as a good thing with no faults and some will interpret this as a cover up for all the bad things the Common Core will cause.
Who might benefit from (and who might be harmed by) this message?
It will comfort parents and educators, but may harm the Common Core because of rumors that could be spread of those things being a cover up for what would really happen.
Representation and Reality:
What information or perspective is left out of this message?
The cons are what is left out of this message.
Is this an accurate and credible representation?
For what is stated it is a credible representation, but is probably biased because it it on the National Education Association website.
How does this reflect the perspective or bias of its creator?
Since it is on the National Education Association website there is probably a bias towards Common Core.